![]() ![]() |
| ianw2000uk |
Mar 3 2008, 11:47 AM
Post
#1
|
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 30 Joined: 30-October 07 Member No.: 6685 |
Hi Guys
I have just ordered 2 shampoos form the following website, let me know if you have used before with any success: http://www.sesderma.co.uk/seskavel-hair-ca...ir_Loss_Shampoo The 2 shampoos I ordered are: 1) Seskavel Anti-hairloss shampoo, plus 2) Seskavel Anti-dandruff shampoo oily. The first one contains an anti-DHT property (1% butyl avocadate), the second contains a well reported ingredient Pyroctone Olamine (0.3%). Any info from any users of these products or ingredients would be welcomed. Best, Ian |
| Pondle |
Mar 3 2008, 03:19 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 445 Joined: 6-December 05 Member No.: 276 |
Aside from Nizoral, I'd be a little wary of shampoos that claim to have DHT-inhibitory properties. As Bill Rassman says here, it's difficult to get these ingredients to absorb deep into the hair follicle.
http://www.baldingblog.com/2007/09/04/does...mpoo-block-dht/ |
| ianw2000uk |
Mar 4 2008, 09:30 AM
Post
#3
|
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 30 Joined: 30-October 07 Member No.: 6685 |
Aside from Nizoral, I'd be a little wary of shampoos that claim to have DHT-inhibitory properties. As Bill Rassman says here, it's difficult to get these ingredients to absorb deep into the hair follicle. http://www.baldingblog.com/2007/09/04/does...mpoo-block-dht/ Thanks Pondle If anyone else uses a shampoo with Piroctone Olamine (e.g. T/Gel anti-dandruff greasy hair), it would be useful to have any feedback Cheers Ian |
| West Ham Wayne |
Mar 24 2008, 10:29 PM
Post
#4
|
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 39 Joined: 16-February 08 Member No.: 9831 |
What you'll find with the shampoo is that you'll need to leave it in for anything between 3- 10 mins. To me, ifind this unrealistic and unpracticle. You just aint gonna stand in the shower counting the minutes down. And also there are obviously no guarantees it will work
|
![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 22nd November 2009 - 06:15 PM |